Evidence from the room
These notes describe specific counts, constraints, and critiques — the kind of evidence that matters for technical analysis training, not star widgets.
“I arrived with three messy counts on USD/JPY. The instructor forced me to discard two before lunch, which stung, but the remaining impulse finally respected the invalidation line we drew together.”
“The seventy-five minutes were almost entirely spent arguing about whether my wave four was a triangle or a flat. I left with clearer labels, though I still want a second pass on the weekly degree.”
“The puzzle charts exposed how often I call early overlaps an impulse. I would have preferred more Hang Seng examples and fewer FX sheets, but the peer comparison round was worth the afternoon.”
“Nesting hourly labels inside the daily structure finally clicked on the second Saturday. Homework between weekends kept me honest when the overnight gap tried to rewrite my count.”
A participant brought a six-month Hang Seng markup that mixed intermediate and minor degrees on the same sheet. During the clinic we separated the weekly impulse, then rebuilt the daily correction as an expanded flat. The alternate count survived the next two sessions’ opens without immediate invalidation, which gave the annotator a calmer checklist rather than a forecast promise.
An equity reader scheduled a private review ahead of a quiet holiday week. We spent the first half marking confirmation levels on the primary count and the second half stress-testing a leading diagonal alternate. The written summary focused on what would force a degree reset — useful study scaffolding without turning the session into trade instructions.